Businessman Bags 140 Years Jail Term For Forging Foreign Cheques
The convict, after he was sentenced to 140 years jail term by Justice Mohammed Idris, of a Lagos Federal High Court
A Federal High Court, Lagos, today, convicted and sentenced a businessman, Mr. Jones Patrick Biyere, to a total of 140 years imprisonment, for forging foreign cheques.
Justice Mohammed Idris convicted and sentenced the businessman, who has been standing trial before the court since 2006, after finding him guilty of 13 counts charge, preferred against him by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC).
The convict trial commenced sometimes in 2006, before the court on a 13 count-charge, bordering on conspiracy, forgery, and exporting the said forged cheques outside Nigeria.
The EFCC had in an amended charge marked FHC/L/288c/06, stated that the convict alongside one Tony Adeyemi and one Eddy, who were at now large, had on or about May 31, 2006, at 15, McCarthy Street, Onikan, Lagos, fraudulently forged and signed 10 Lloyd’s TBS Cheques with numbers 002108; 002104; 000096; 00091; 005263; 005260; 000147; 000144; 000546; and 000550.
He was also said to have attempted to export the said Cheques to foreign country through the offices of United Parcel Services (UPS), situated at Somolu and Gbagada.
The offences according to the EFCC are contrary to sections 3(2)a 6(2)(b) and 6(1) of the Miscellaneous Offences Act. Cap. 410, Laws of the Federation of Nigeria, 1990, as amended by Act. 62 of 1999, and punishable under Sections 3 and 3(b) of the Counterfeit Currency (Special Provisions) Act No. 22 of 1984 Cap. 77, Laws of the Federation of Nigeria, 1990.
He pleaded not guilty to the charge, when first arraigned before the court in 2006, and was admitted to bail.
In the course of trial, the convict bail was revoked by Justice Idris, after he failed and refused to attend trial on severally adjourned dates.
Judge had also foreclosed the convict’s right to open his defence, due to alleged prolong delayed tactics.
The court had noted that in further delaying the case, the accused had changed counsels, who at different occasions sought for adjournments to enable them prepare their defence.
The actions, which Justice Idris declared as ‘ploy to continued delay and frustrate the case, which he inherited from two judges of the court’.